Andrew87OGR Forum Member
I know some are very particular on what they have on their layout. Do you prefer the real or fantasy trains. I like the fantasy ones although I do like real also.
- Report Topic
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
RussellOGR Forum Member
BOTH !!!
Most of my equipment is what the UP and Rio Grande actually ran.
And that is the focus of my layout, A branch line of the Rio Grande meeting up with the UP in Ogden Utah.
Now, This line never existed except in my mind but I want to model the town I grew up in on my layout, so that's the way it works.
I do have 2 total Fantasy trains, The Coors Silver Bullet and the Lionel Phantom.
The Silver Bullet is just to cool to skip and the Phantom is interesting and works well for a Halloween train.
Last edited by Russell
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
Bob SeverinOGR Forum Member
Real trains are real. Everything else is just a fantasy of what the real world actually is. Train modelers are just trying to re-create the actual world of railroading, but, it is actually all just fantasy, albeit, very realistic fantasy.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
dkdkrdOGR Forum Member
For moi, I like to think it's ALL fantasy!!
That way I don't let myself get caught up in the rivet-counting paranoia that frustrates so many.
Oh, sure, the colors, fonts, names, etc. may be drawn from record books, but there's no steam in the pipes, there's no pistons in the diesels, and there's this third rail that folks seem to wax eloquent about.
Fantasy..... Begins with the same letter as Fun!
KD
Last edited by dkdkrd
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 3
ChugmanOGR Forum Member DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER
I enjoy seeing others having fun with fantasy trains, but trying to recreate real trains gives me the most pleasure.
Art
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
trainnut56OGR Forum Member
Well said gentlemen it's all about the fun.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
Lee WillisOGR Forum Member
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 3
Larry Sr.OGR Forum Member SUPPORTING MEMBER
Both
I just can't resist some of the fantasy trains. It's the kid still in me I guess.
Russell you and I sure like our Coors trains.
Larry
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
Michigan & Ohio Valley LinesOGR Forum Member
I like both real and fantasy trains equally.
Last edited by Michigan & Ohio Valley Lines
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 2
josefOGR Forum Member
For me, its boy I wish my railroad had one of them engines. In my world of fantasy, rather than the real world, everything is possible.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 1
CAPPilotOGR Forum Member SUPPORTING MEMBERDIGITAL SUBSCRIBER
I try not to get too deep into questions like this. The poster's question seems to be fantasy paint schemes (never existed) vs. realistic paint schemes (existed on at least one real item) on our models. I like realistic looking models on my late 1940s PRR themed layout mainly because it helps me limit my total purchases; I have no problem with things not being absolutely correct. I do have a few fantasy schemes as part of my Bicentennial and Red/White/Blue collection, either because I really like the fantasy scheme or it has special meaning.
Ron
Attachments
Hide
Last edited by CAPPilot
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 1
Former Member
I think the line between real and fantasy at times can be blurry at times. There are clear cut examples of fantasy trains like the Polar Express that are more seasonal in nature and during the Christmas season, just plain fun to have on a layout that is not fantasy related.
Then add to this the new Lionel fantasy SP Cab Forward in the Daylight colors. The look of the engine may be pure fantasy, but it is scale in detail in every other respect. Most of us who ordered this engine will run it in our regular layouts regardless of the fact that it never appeared in the real world.
So I don't think there is a clear answer to your question.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
Michael HokkanenOGR Forum Member
Real trains in a fantasy world of my choosing. The steam - diesel transition period with all kinds of anachronisms thrown in.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 1
Bobbie21921OGR Forum Member
Gentlemen and women
This thread touches on the heart of our civilization for it can be said that all things that have been created it has always started in someones head as a Fantasy and it is to all those thinkers that we have to thank for all the Real Trains out there on the Rails. Also think of it this way The fantasy rail lines and equipment that has been introduced breaks up all of our Normal everyday same old diesel pulling same old Hoppers or Freight going down the tracks to the east west north and south.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
overlandflyerOGR Forum Member
Originally Posted by Passenger Train Collector:
I think the line between real and fantasy at times can be blurry at times. ...
So I don't think there is a clear answer to your question.
there are no blurred lines here. the cab forward locomotives were freight haulers built for a specific need. Daylight livery was applied to passenger locomotives on specific routes. anything not historically, or for that matter, logically accurate, is fantasy, period.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
railOGR Forum Member
On another forum, we do a different car each year. We do a lot of research to identify authentic road numbers, build dates, color and data. That's the reality aspect. As for the fantasy, we've added instructions such as NO BULLSHIPPING on a stock car, or BS for Blended Sand and when empty return to Washington DC for more BS on a 3 bay covered hopper. We've done totally absurd warnings as a poke at modern times. A few years ago, we did a Reading 3 bay composite hopper with Do Not Stand In Hopper When Filling, on the drop doors. Our car this year, a B&A flat to gondola conversion which was dedicated to our founder, who is a Boston & Albany guy. We get the best of both worlds, and since our runs are just over 100 cars most of the time, they are also collectible. Here are some pics of the B&A gondola.
Don
Attachments
Hide
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
challenger3980OGR Forum Member
Originally Posted by overlandflyer:
Originally Posted by Passenger Train Collector:
I think the line between real and fantasy at times can be blurry at times. ...
So I don't think there is a clear answer to your question.
there are no blurred lines here. the cab forward locomotives were freight haulers built for a specific need. Daylight livery was applied to passenger locomotives on specific routes. anything not historically, or for that matter, logically accurate, is fantasy, period.
IIRC, I have read of the cab-forwards pulling passenger trains, I was surprised to read that myself. I will have to try to find something more definite, but I do believe that they were used in some passenger service.
One of my some day custom jobs is going to be having an SP AC-9 Skirted and Daylighted, Nope SP never did that to an AC 9, so I hope to some day correct that oversight in 3 rail O Scale .
Doug
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 1
AGHRMattOGR Forum Member SUPPORTING MEMBERMEMORIAL SUPPORTER
As the self-appointed Information Minister of the Isle of Denial, I have both.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
Andy HummellOGR Forum Member SUPPORTING MEMBER
I like what I like, real or fantasy. I have both.
My favorite trains in my collection are my scale Polar Express (fantasy to the max!) and my SMR W&ARR 4-4-0's (incredible reality).
The only limits I place on myself are the limits of my personal taste.
Andy
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
Rusty TraqueOGR Forum Member
Originally Posted by challenger3980:
Originally Posted by overlandflyer:
Originally Posted by Passenger Train Collector:
there are no blurred lines here. the cab forward locomotives were freight haulers built for a specific need.
IIRC, I have read of the cab-forwards pulling passenger trains, I was surprised to read that myself. I will have to try to find something more definite, but I do believe that they were used in some passenger service.
Yep, although it seems most of the cab-forward photo's online are of cab-forwards pulling freight, they did indeed pull passenger trains:
There's also plenty of proof of cab-forwards pulling passenger trains on various SP videos.
Rusty
Attachments
Hide
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 1
Pat KnOGR Forum Member
I like both. I try to follow the prototype for my scale Pennsy trains but I also run a New York Yankees train, Warner brothers train and Hogwarts Express.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
handyandyOGR Forum Member
My idea of a fantasy train would be narrow gauge and include an anthropomorphic steam locomotive pulling a train of four wheeled cars with a crew made up of elves and leprechauns or maybe munchkins or oopah-loompahs. At least one car is a stock car loaded with unicorns. One car hauls pots of gold. Perhaps a gondola full of rainbows and another car loaded with scrapple and other rare delicacies! And a little red caboose on the end with a rotund, but jolly elf/leprechaun/munchkin/oompah-loompah conductor. LOL
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
Prewar PappyOGR Forum Member
The best part of Tinplate Trains is that every train is a Fantasy Train.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 1
Martin HOGR Forum Member
Real trains are better.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
LimaOGR Forum Member
Originally Posted by Rusty Traque:
Originally Posted by challenger3980:
Originally Posted by overlandflyer:
Originally Posted by Passenger Train Collector:
there are no blurred lines here. the cab forward locomotives were freight haulers built for a specific need.
IIRC, I have read of the cab-forwards pulling passenger trains, I was surprised to read that myself. I will have to try to find something more definite, but I do believe that they were used in some passenger service.
Yep, although it seems most of the cab-forward photo's online are of cab-forwards pulling freight, they did indeed pull passenger trains:
There's also plenty of proof of cab-forwards pulling passenger trains on various SP videos.
Rusty
Thinking he was refering to "Daylight" painted cab forwards and passenger trains.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
Bob SeverinOGR Forum Member
Originally Posted by Martin H:
Real trains are better.
Sure, but it's hard to get them up on the layout.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
Prewar PappyOGR Forum Member
Originally Posted by Rusty Traque:
Yep, although it seems most of the cab-forward photo's online are of cab-forwards pulling freight, they did indeed pull passenger trains:
There's also plenty of proof of cab-forwards pulling passenger trains on various SP videos.
Rusty
Rusty,
I have a repro SP Travel Poster showing same pulling a full consist of heavyweights headed to Seattle.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
overlandflyerOGR Forum Member
Originally Posted by Rusty Traque:
Originally Posted by challenger3980:
Originally Posted by overlandflyer:
Originally Posted by Passenger Train Collector:
there are no blurred lines here. the cab forward locomotives were freight haulers built for a specific need.
IIRC, I have read of the cab-forwards pulling passenger trains, I was surprised to read that myself. I will have to try to find something more definite, but I do believe that they were used in some passenger service.
Yep, although it seems most of the cab-forward photo's online are of cab-forwards pulling freight, they did indeed pull passenger trains:
There's also plenty of proof of cab-forwards pulling passenger trains on various SP videos.
Rusty
AC-12 Driver Diameter: 63"
AC-12 Tractive Effort: 125,000 lbs
GS-4 Driver Diameter: 80"
GS-4 Tractive Effort: 66,000 lbs
while it's true that the 4-8-4 wheel arrangement is often referred to as a dual purpose locomotive, there is no doubt that the AC class was built for lower speed, large tonnage consists. whatever use they might be called on to perform within their divisions was likely based on economic or perhaps safety factors.
to me the cab-forward is a gorgeous locomotive in basic black.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
Gary GravesOGR Forum Member
Both have their advantages. I can hold and control model trains, but the real ones make real traffic come to a stop, the ground rumble, bells ring and lights flash like nothing else. I can imagine a different world when a fantasy model train rolls through, and a different time when a real model train rolls through. I like them all.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
Charlie HowardOGR Forum Member
Threads like this make me chuckle.......... Please no one take offense, I'm not going to knock anyone. To each his own. However MPO they are all toys. I used to model HO and tried to achieve as much realism as possible. But it's all a compromise. Scenes can be made to scale and look very realistic, but even most of those are compressed. I laugh every time I read or hear 3 Rail Scale. I know what it is, but I still laugh. Back years ago I did not like Lionel, ie 3 rail. It was the track. No way to make it look truly scale. But now I have a different appreciation for O 3 rail. Oh I'd like to have 2 rail, but it would still be more toy like, space restraints keeping from a closer to scale enviroment. And trying to maintain scale in O will drive you crazy. The lack of 1:48 vehicles.... Most of us use 1:43 but those actually range from about 1:55 to even 1:34 all advertised as 1:43. And even when everything is in perfect scale, the layout ..................... too small. Now do what you want. That's what it's all about. It's a hobby..........not rocket science. Have fun. I do what I call Toy Scale. IE: scale elements, mixed with compressed building detailed more to scale, figures that may be larger and out of scale slightly. Kind of like a modern animated film. You know it's animated, you know it's not real, but it has a hint of reality, and a hint of cartoon. And I personally don't care to impress the adults. I like the kids, especially the younger ones, about 10 and under to ohh and aww. So fantasy is a part of my plans. From Super Heros, to Ficticious paint schemes I love em all. But I like Realistic Fiction, if that makes sense. You know something that is plausable. Thomas the tank engine, to me, is not. Tripple 7 from Unstoppable is, unrealistic as the movie is. Now I know this is subjective. A Goblin will look different in everyone's mind. My Mother, and 6th grad teacher, read to us "The Hobbit". Rankin Bass animated it............... It Sucked............. because my mind had different pictures of the hobbits, and goblins and such. But to me in the end it's all Fantasy. Because to me they are all still toys. Some may be very expensive and very close to scale, But they are not real, so they are all a little bit of Fantasy. And that is good. Even a great spot on scale scene, still takes a squint of the eye and a little imagination to place us in that scene. So on my little layout, King Kong, The Stay Puff Marshmellow Man, Super Man, Bat Man, and the Mario Brother in their go karts are just as real as the Lionel, and MTH trains that make the rounds. And that is COOL..............
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 3
Rusty TraqueOGR Forum Member
Sure looks like a Cab Forward on a passenger train to me (no sound):
Rusty
Last edited by Rusty Traque
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 2
SwaffordOGR Forum Member
Last edited by Swafford
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 1
John KorlingOGR Forum Member
Originally Posted by Swafford:
I get tired ofjust the color schemes of the 21st Century Class I railroads.
Regards,
Swafford
That's why they also offer models of locomotives that are from the era the paint schemes existed.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
breezinupOGR Forum Member DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER
Originally Posted by Swafford:
IappreciateLionel and MTH presenting prototypical diesel locomotives. On the other hand, I enjoy the fantasy color schemes. I get tired ofjust the color schemes of the 21st Century Class I railroads.
Regards,
Swafford
While we can buy trains with liveries from earlier times, for modern railfans it's certainly easy to be nostalgic for the variety of railroads that existed back in, say, the 60s, with all the different liveries that were around then. Far more interesting, in many respects, than having just the handful of mega-railroads that are around today, which over the years have swallowed up dozens and dozens of the different lines that once existed.
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
GNKOGR Forum Member
Rusty,
Great video.
George
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
Southwest HiawathaOGR Forum Member
I have a complex relationship with reality and fantasy. I do both realistic and fantasy trains. When running 0 gauge scale, I like to stick to real or plausible "what if" engines and rolling stock. I will occasionally go for an outright fantasy, like a "what if" Hiawatha paint job on a GG-1, but on the whole I prefer to stick close to the real or near-real. I like billboard reefers and I don't exclude one just because it's decorated for a brand of beer that didn't actually have its own reefer. In fact, one of my favorites is Olde Frothingslosh, which started out as a fantasy beer (although Pittsburgh Brewing did eventually brew some beer under that name).
I absolutely loathe holiday cars, Disney, Looney Tunes, cop and hobo chase cars, and all the other off the wall stuff that shows up in Christmas catalogs. Ditto the American Presidents commemoratives, etc. etc. ad nauseum. I didn't like that stuff when I was a little kid and I still don't. Loved Bugs and Daffy on TV, didn't want them on my train layout.
In tinplate, anything goes! Tinplate is a fantasy anyway. My tinplate McKeen car looks like something out of a steampunk graphic novel, but it's real so there you are.
This is my favorite fantasy locomotive.
Attachments
Hide
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 1
Pat KnOGR Forum Member
The real railroads like fantasy trains too. After all,isn't the NS Heratage Engines a fantasy scheme?
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
Rusty TraqueOGR Forum Member
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
LimaOGR Forum Member
Originally Posted by Pat Kn:
The real railroads like fantasy trains too. After all,isn't the NS Heratage Engines a fantasy scheme?
Not at all Pat, they painted them upand they exist!
(Now those earlier "Lionel's own"versions of older roads?...)
Last edited by Lima
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0
breezinupOGR Forum Member DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER
Originally Posted by Pat Kn:
The real railroads like fantasy trains too. After all,isn't the NS Heratage Engines a fantasy scheme?
It's a little easier to touch a bit of reality with those than some others.
Last edited by breezinup
- Report Reply
- Printer Friendly Format
❤️ 0